<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1803 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277057</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal in part and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal. It upheld the exclusion of Motilal Oswal Investment Advisors Ltd. as a comparable due to its involvement in multiple business verticals. The inclusion of ICRA Management Consulting Services Ltd. and IDC (India) Ltd. as comparables and the exclusion of Ladderup Corporate Advisory Pvt. Ltd. were also affirmed. This decision resulted in the adjustment of the arm&#039;s length price falling within an acceptable range, rendering further discussion on other comparables unnecessary. Grounds Nos. 9 and 10 were considered premature and not addressed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2018 21:20:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=543328" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1803 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277057</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal in part and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal. It upheld the exclusion of Motilal Oswal Investment Advisors Ltd. as a comparable due to its involvement in multiple business verticals. The inclusion of ICRA Management Consulting Services Ltd. and IDC (India) Ltd. as comparables and the exclusion of Ladderup Corporate Advisory Pvt. Ltd. were also affirmed. This decision resulted in the adjustment of the arm&#039;s length price falling within an acceptable range, rendering further discussion on other comparables unnecessary. Grounds Nos. 9 and 10 were considered premature and not addressed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277057</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>