https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277055 The Tribunal allowed the appellant's appeal, directing the Assessing Officer and Transfer Pricing Officer to recompute the arm's length price by including previously rejected comparables and excluding newly included ones. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld the direction to delete the disallowance under Section 40(a)(i) for reimbursement of expenses to the overseas holding company, citing that the expenses were already subjected to tax deduction at source. en-us Fri, 11 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Nov 2018 21:20:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277055 The Tribunal allowed the appellant's appeal, directing the Assessing Officer and Transfer Pricing Officer to recompute the arm's length price by including previously rejected comparables and excluding newly included ones. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld the direction to delete the disallowance under Section 40(a)(i) for reimbursement of expenses to the overseas holding company, citing that the expenses were already subjected to tax deduction at source. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 11 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277055