<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1932 (11) TMI 12 - LAHORE HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277043</link>
    <description>Income already disclosed to and assessed by the revenue does not become &quot;escaped assessment&quot; merely because the original assessment was later set aside for wrong categorisation, so reassessment under section 34 was not justified. An impartible ancestral estate governed by primogeniture may still retain the character of Hindu family property, meaning the holder can be assessed as the managing member of a Hindu undivided family rather than as an individual. A fixed annual payment to the younger brother, made under the family arrangement in substitution of his share, was treated as his own income and not as the assessee&#039;s taxable income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 1932 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2018 17:39:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=543301" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1932 (11) TMI 12 - LAHORE HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277043</link>
      <description>Income already disclosed to and assessed by the revenue does not become &quot;escaped assessment&quot; merely because the original assessment was later set aside for wrong categorisation, so reassessment under section 34 was not justified. An impartible ancestral estate governed by primogeniture may still retain the character of Hindu family property, meaning the holder can be assessed as the managing member of a Hindu undivided family rather than as an individual. A fixed annual payment to the younger brother, made under the family arrangement in substitution of his share, was treated as his own income and not as the assessee&#039;s taxable income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 1932 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277043</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>