<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1958 (10) TMI 60 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277036</link>
    <description>A voluntary payment by a former employer was held taxable as salary where the contemporaneous order showed it was made in consideration of loyal and meritorious past services. The later description of the payment as a gift did not alter its true character, because Explanation 2 to section 7(1) covered remuneration or recompense for past employment, subject only to the specific exclusion for compensation for loss of employment. Once the receipt arose from the employment relationship and fell within section 7(1), its casual or non-recurring nature did not exempt it from tax. The amount was therefore taxable in the assessee&#039;s hands.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2018 16:01:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=543285" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1958 (10) TMI 60 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277036</link>
      <description>A voluntary payment by a former employer was held taxable as salary where the contemporaneous order showed it was made in consideration of loyal and meritorious past services. The later description of the payment as a gift did not alter its true character, because Explanation 2 to section 7(1) covered remuneration or recompense for past employment, subject only to the specific exclusion for compensation for loss of employment. Once the receipt arose from the employment relationship and fell within section 7(1), its casual or non-recurring nature did not exempt it from tax. The amount was therefore taxable in the assessee&#039;s hands.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277036</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>