<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (11) TMI 46 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15320</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madras ruled that income derived from a lodging house, where the building and furniture were let out as a single transaction, should be assessed under &quot;Income from other sources.&quot; The Court found that the letting was inseparable based on the terms of the lease agreements and partnership deed, supported by a single consideration. Upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision, the Court held that the entire rent from the composite letting should fall under &quot;Income from other sources.&quot; The judgment favored the assessee, concluding the common question of law in their favor against the Revenue, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 17:11:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54320" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (11) TMI 46 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15320</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madras ruled that income derived from a lodging house, where the building and furniture were let out as a single transaction, should be assessed under &quot;Income from other sources.&quot; The Court found that the letting was inseparable based on the terms of the lease agreements and partnership deed, supported by a single consideration. Upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision, the Court held that the entire rent from the composite letting should fall under &quot;Income from other sources.&quot; The judgment favored the assessee, concluding the common question of law in their favor against the Revenue, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15320</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>