<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1072 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370729</link>
    <description>The Court condoned the delay, but declined to entertain the Special Leave Petition because the tax effect was below the monetary threshold for invoking discretionary jurisdiction. The petition was dismissed on the ground that the low tax effect did not justify consideration on merits, even though delay had been excused.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2018 07:14:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=543131" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1072 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370729</link>
      <description>The Court condoned the delay, but declined to entertain the Special Leave Petition because the tax effect was below the monetary threshold for invoking discretionary jurisdiction. The petition was dismissed on the ground that the low tax effect did not justify consideration on merits, even though delay had been excused.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370729</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>