<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1046 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370703</link>
    <description>The Tribunal admitted the application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, to initiate the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against the corporate debtor, M/s. Basic India Limited. It confirmed its territorial jurisdiction, appointed an Interim Resolution Professional, Mr. Anup Sood, and declared a moratorium. The objections raised by the corporate debtor regarding financial discrepancies, forum shopping, and insurance cover were dismissed. The Tribunal emphasized the need for cooperation with the IRP and highlighted that the default exceeding Rs. 1 lakh was adequate to trigger the CIRP.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2018 07:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=543105" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1046 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370703</link>
      <description>The Tribunal admitted the application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, to initiate the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against the corporate debtor, M/s. Basic India Limited. It confirmed its territorial jurisdiction, appointed an Interim Resolution Professional, Mr. Anup Sood, and declared a moratorium. The objections raised by the corporate debtor regarding financial discrepancies, forum shopping, and insurance cover were dismissed. The Tribunal emphasized the need for cooperation with the IRP and highlighted that the default exceeding Rs. 1 lakh was adequate to trigger the CIRP.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370703</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>