https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370699 The Competition Commission of India concluded that the allegations against the Opposite Parties concerning the Development Agreement did not contravene Section 3 of the Competition Act, 2002, as the issues pertained to consumer and contractual disputes rather than anti-competitive practices. The Commission determined that the matter was a private injury issue outside its jurisdiction and advised the parties to pursue resolution through appropriate legal avenues. Consequently, the case was closed under Section 26(2) of the Competition Act, 2002, and the Informants were notified of the decision and its rationale. en-us Wed, 10 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Nov 2018 07:09:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370699 The Competition Commission of India concluded that the allegations against the Opposite Parties concerning the Development Agreement did not contravene Section 3 of the Competition Act, 2002, as the issues pertained to consumer and contractual disputes rather than anti-competitive practices. The Commission determined that the matter was a private injury issue outside its jurisdiction and advised the parties to pursue resolution through appropriate legal avenues. Consequently, the case was closed under Section 26(2) of the Competition Act, 2002, and the Informants were notified of the decision and its rationale. Case-Laws Law of Competition Wed, 10 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370699