<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1039 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370696</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Order-in-Original confirming the demand with interest and penalty against the appellant for non-payment of service tax collected from customers. Despite the appellant&#039;s financial constraints defense, failure to deposit the service tax amount led to penalties under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The Tribunal noted the absence of evidence rebutting the findings, including the appellant&#039;s failure to deposit service tax since December 2007. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, emphasizing the statutory obligation to deposit collected service tax and invoking the extended period of limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2018 07:08:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=543096" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1039 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370696</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Order-in-Original confirming the demand with interest and penalty against the appellant for non-payment of service tax collected from customers. Despite the appellant&#039;s financial constraints defense, failure to deposit the service tax amount led to penalties under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The Tribunal noted the absence of evidence rebutting the findings, including the appellant&#039;s failure to deposit service tax since December 2007. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, emphasizing the statutory obligation to deposit collected service tax and invoking the extended period of limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370696</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>