https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370677 The tribunal upheld the classification of the appellant's product under CETH 4809, confirming the duty and interest demand. However, the penalty imposed was set aside due to the absence of malafide intent in the classification change, as reasoned by the tribunal. The appeal was disposed of accordingly. en-us Wed, 14 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 06 Apr 2019 15:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370677 The tribunal upheld the classification of the appellant's product under CETH 4809, confirming the duty and interest demand. However, the penalty imposed was set aside due to the absence of malafide intent in the classification change, as reasoned by the tribunal. The appeal was disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 14 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370677