https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370677 Goods possessing the essential characteristics of self-copy paper were classifiable under the more specific tariff entry, CETH 4809, rather than as coated paper under CETH 4810. The classification dispute was decided against the appellant on that issue, so duty and interest were sustained. However, the dispute was bona fide and there was no material of mala fide conduct; accordingly, penalty under Rule 25 read with Section 11AC was not justified and was set aside. en-us Wed, 14 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 06 Apr 2019 15:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370677 Goods possessing the essential characteristics of self-copy paper were classifiable under the more specific tariff entry, CETH 4809, rather than as coated paper under CETH 4810. The classification dispute was decided against the appellant on that issue, so duty and interest were sustained. However, the dispute was bona fide and there was no material of mala fide conduct; accordingly, penalty under Rule 25 read with Section 11AC was not justified and was set aside. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 14 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370677