<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1019 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370676</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the appellant was entitled to avail CENVAT credit on invoices issued before the amendment dates in July 2014 and March 2015. The tribunal determined that the amended provision did not have retrospective effect, thereby granting relief to the appellant and setting aside the demand raised by the tax authorities for availing credit beyond the prescribed time limit under Rule 4(1) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2018 06:38:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=543069" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1019 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370676</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the appellant was entitled to avail CENVAT credit on invoices issued before the amendment dates in July 2014 and March 2015. The tribunal determined that the amended provision did not have retrospective effect, thereby granting relief to the appellant and setting aside the demand raised by the tax authorities for availing credit beyond the prescribed time limit under Rule 4(1) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370676</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>