<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1008 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370665</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal of the assessee, ruling that the transactions were ordinary business dealings and not subject to deemed dividend provisions under section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal emphasized the need to analyze the purpose and nature of transactions accurately to determine the applicability of tax provisions, overturning the decisions of the lower authorities and deleting the additions made by the Assessing Officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2018 17:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=543052" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1008 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370665</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal of the assessee, ruling that the transactions were ordinary business dealings and not subject to deemed dividend provisions under section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal emphasized the need to analyze the purpose and nature of transactions accurately to determine the applicability of tax provisions, overturning the decisions of the lower authorities and deleting the additions made by the Assessing Officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370665</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>