<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (10) TMI 26 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15305</link>
    <description>Section 119(2)(b) relief for belated returns was examined year-wise in the context of carry forward of business loss and unabsorbed depreciation for a sick industrial company. Delay could not be condoned where the assessee had filed returns beyond section 139(1) and had not secured any relevant tax-treatment provision in the rehabilitation scheme; the refusal was upheld for the assessment years 1988-89 and 1991-92. For 1989-90, the delay was only three days, and the matter had to be reconsidered because undue hardship and the assessee&#039;s sick-industry status had not been properly weighed. The governing principle is that condonation cannot be refused by a blanket approach and must consider all material circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 16:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54305" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (10) TMI 26 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15305</link>
      <description>Section 119(2)(b) relief for belated returns was examined year-wise in the context of carry forward of business loss and unabsorbed depreciation for a sick industrial company. Delay could not be condoned where the assessee had filed returns beyond section 139(1) and had not secured any relevant tax-treatment provision in the rehabilitation scheme; the refusal was upheld for the assessment years 1988-89 and 1991-92. For 1989-90, the delay was only three days, and the matter had to be reconsidered because undue hardship and the assessee&#039;s sick-industry status had not been properly weighed. The governing principle is that condonation cannot be refused by a blanket approach and must consider all material circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15305</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>