<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1003 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370660</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on the status of the assessee as a Firm, deletion of additions for unexplained investment and sundry creditors, and the revised disallowance of expenses. It also deleted the disallowances under sections 40(a)(ia) and 40A(3), finding them unsustainable based on the facts and evidence provided. The appeal of the revenue was dismissed, and the cross objection of the assessee was partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2018 21:31:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=543046" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1003 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370660</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on the status of the assessee as a Firm, deletion of additions for unexplained investment and sundry creditors, and the revised disallowance of expenses. It also deleted the disallowances under sections 40(a)(ia) and 40A(3), finding them unsustainable based on the facts and evidence provided. The appeal of the revenue was dismissed, and the cross objection of the assessee was partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370660</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>