<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 983 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370640</link>
    <description>The Tribunal referred several key issues regarding the taxability of incentives received for performance, specifying the sub-clause of Business Auxiliary Services (BAS), the necessity of a tripartite agreement, taxation of incentives under a fixed value of service, consideration for service under Section 67, and the relationship between service provider and receiver to a larger bench for resolution due to conflicting judgments and the need for a consistent legal position. The Tribunal directed the registry to place the records before the Hon&#039;ble President for the constitution of a larger bench to address these issues comprehensively.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2019 12:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=543020" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 983 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370640</link>
      <description>The Tribunal referred several key issues regarding the taxability of incentives received for performance, specifying the sub-clause of Business Auxiliary Services (BAS), the necessity of a tripartite agreement, taxation of incentives under a fixed value of service, consideration for service under Section 67, and the relationship between service provider and receiver to a larger bench for resolution due to conflicting judgments and the need for a consistent legal position. The Tribunal directed the registry to place the records before the Hon&#039;ble President for the constitution of a larger bench to address these issues comprehensively.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370640</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>