<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 982 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370639</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case involving demands for service tax on Video Tape Production, Programme Production Service, and renting of Immovable property. The impugned order confirmed the tax demand and imposed penalties under Section 78 but not under Section 76. The Tribunal directed a de novo adjudication due to missing crucial data, emphasizing accurate quantification of tax liabilities and the provision of cum duty benefit. The penalty under Section 78 was upheld, aligning with revised tax liabilities determined in fresh proceedings, stressing the need for complete and verifiable information during tax disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2018 21:29:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=543019" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 982 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370639</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case involving demands for service tax on Video Tape Production, Programme Production Service, and renting of Immovable property. The impugned order confirmed the tax demand and imposed penalties under Section 78 but not under Section 76. The Tribunal directed a de novo adjudication due to missing crucial data, emphasizing accurate quantification of tax liabilities and the provision of cum duty benefit. The penalty under Section 78 was upheld, aligning with revised tax liabilities determined in fresh proceedings, stressing the need for complete and verifiable information during tax disputes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370639</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>