<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 975 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370632</link>
    <description>An application for early hearing was allowed procedurally by directing that the matter be listed before the appropriate Bench in February 2019. The interlocutory application was disposed of on that basis, with no adjudication on the substantive central excise dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2018 21:28:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=543010" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 975 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370632</link>
      <description>An application for early hearing was allowed procedurally by directing that the matter be listed before the appropriate Bench in February 2019. The interlocutory application was disposed of on that basis, with no adjudication on the substantive central excise dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370632</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>