<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 966 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370623</link>
    <description>Tanks and reactors fabricated and installed entirely at site, once embedded to earth, are treated as immovable property and not excisable goods, so central excise duty is not sustainable on that basis. The article also notes that composite site execution involving supply of material and fabrication falls within works contract rather than erection and commissioning services; a demand raised under the wrong taxable head is untenable, especially where the invoices do not evidence service tax recovery from the client.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2018 21:28:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=542994" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 966 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370623</link>
      <description>Tanks and reactors fabricated and installed entirely at site, once embedded to earth, are treated as immovable property and not excisable goods, so central excise duty is not sustainable on that basis. The article also notes that composite site execution involving supply of material and fabrication falls within works contract rather than erection and commissioning services; a demand raised under the wrong taxable head is untenable, especially where the invoices do not evidence service tax recovery from the client.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370623</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>