<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 966 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370623</link>
    <description>Site-fabricated tanks and reactors embedded to earth become immovable property and are not excisable goods; central excise duty is therefore unsustainable where no finished goods are manufactured in a factory. Composite contracts involving supply of materials and on-site fabrication fall within works contract service rather than erection and commissioning service. A service tax demand raised under erection and commissioning cannot be sustained where the activity is classifiable as works contract, particularly where invoices do not establish recovery of service tax from the client. Duty, service tax and related penalties were set aside with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2018 21:28:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=542994" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 966 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370623</link>
      <description>Site-fabricated tanks and reactors embedded to earth become immovable property and are not excisable goods; central excise duty is therefore unsustainable where no finished goods are manufactured in a factory. Composite contracts involving supply of materials and on-site fabrication fall within works contract service rather than erection and commissioning service. A service tax demand raised under erection and commissioning cannot be sustained where the activity is classifiable as works contract, particularly where invoices do not establish recovery of service tax from the client. Duty, service tax and related penalties were set aside with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370623</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>