https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370621 The Tribunal allowed the condonation of delay in filing the appeal due to the illness of the person in charge of the appellant company. Regarding the inclusion of subsidy amounts disbursed to the appellant in the assessable value of goods, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant. Citing precedents and relevant case law, the Tribunal held that the subsidy amounts should not be included in the assessable value of goods for the purpose of the Central Excise Act. Consequently, the impugned orders were set aside, and the appeals were allowed, providing relief to the appellant. en-us Wed, 14 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 21 Nov 2018 21:28:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370621 The Tribunal allowed the condonation of delay in filing the appeal due to the illness of the person in charge of the appellant company. Regarding the inclusion of subsidy amounts disbursed to the appellant in the assessable value of goods, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant. Citing precedents and relevant case law, the Tribunal held that the subsidy amounts should not be included in the assessable value of goods for the purpose of the Central Excise Act. Consequently, the impugned orders were set aside, and the appeals were allowed, providing relief to the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 14 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370621