<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1755 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276992</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and affirmed the respondent&#039;s entitlement to the Cenvat credit availed based on invoices issued by M/s. Indian Hotel Company Limited during the period from April 2005 to March 2009. The Tribunal found that the respondent&#039;s classification as &#039;Management Consultancy Services&#039; was valid, following a precedent set in a previous case involving the same service provider. The appeal lacked merit, and the respondent&#039;s right to the credit was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2018 21:27:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=542982" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1755 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276992</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and affirmed the respondent&#039;s entitlement to the Cenvat credit availed based on invoices issued by M/s. Indian Hotel Company Limited during the period from April 2005 to March 2009. The Tribunal found that the respondent&#039;s classification as &#039;Management Consultancy Services&#039; was valid, following a precedent set in a previous case involving the same service provider. The appeal lacked merit, and the respondent&#039;s right to the credit was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276992</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>