<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 1187 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276997</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appeals and allowed the writ petitions, holding that industries in the Northeastern region should continue to enjoy full exemption from Central Excise Duty as per the original policies and notifications. The court found that the modified notifications withdrawing concessions were unjustified, emphasizing the principles of promissory estoppel and the lack of substantial public interest to support the government&#039;s actions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 May 2022 15:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=542977" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 1187 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276997</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appeals and allowed the writ petitions, holding that industries in the Northeastern region should continue to enjoy full exemption from Central Excise Duty as per the original policies and notifications. The court found that the modified notifications withdrawing concessions were unjustified, emphasizing the principles of promissory estoppel and the lack of substantial public interest to support the government&#039;s actions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276997</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>