<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 1196 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276999</link>
    <description>The Tribunal&#039;s remand of the exempt income issue to the Assessing Officer for factual verification involved no legal infirmity, so no substantial question of law arose and interference was declined. The High Court treated the order as a factual restoration rather than a determination on merits, and rejected the challenge on that ground.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2018 21:27:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=542975" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 1196 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276999</link>
      <description>The Tribunal&#039;s remand of the exempt income issue to the Assessing Officer for factual verification involved no legal infirmity, so no substantial question of law arose and interference was declined. The High Court treated the order as a factual restoration rather than a determination on merits, and rejected the challenge on that ground.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276999</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>