<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1473 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277000</link>
    <description>Where a Tribunal order has not been stayed in further appeal, the authority must give effect to it and cannot withhold the consequential relief. The Court noted that this includes refund of excess tax paid, and that interest follows in accordance with the applicable statutory provisions. The direction was tied to the legal effect of an unstayed appellate order and the taxpayer&#039;s entitlement to refund and interest on excess tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2018 21:27:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=542974" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1473 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277000</link>
      <description>Where a Tribunal order has not been stayed in further appeal, the authority must give effect to it and cannot withhold the consequential relief. The Court noted that this includes refund of excess tax paid, and that interest follows in accordance with the applicable statutory provisions. The direction was tied to the legal effect of an unstayed appellate order and the taxpayer&#039;s entitlement to refund and interest on excess tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277000</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>