https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277011 Original loan documents, a bank-certified statement of account and an authenticated Section 65B certificate were treated as sufficient proof of the lending transaction and outstanding liability. The court held that a recovery suit could not be dismissed on an unduly technical objection to electronic evidence where authenticity was otherwise established, the defendants had not disputed execution, and there was no real allegation of tampering or fabrication. The recovery dismissal was set aside and the bank was found entitled to a decree for the outstanding amount with pendente lite interest. en-us Tue, 03 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 21 Nov 2018 21:27:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277011 Original loan documents, a bank-certified statement of account and an authenticated Section 65B certificate were treated as sufficient proof of the lending transaction and outstanding liability. The court held that a recovery suit could not be dismissed on an unduly technical objection to electronic evidence where authenticity was otherwise established, the defendants had not disputed execution, and there was no real allegation of tampering or fabrication. The recovery dismissal was set aside and the bank was found entitled to a decree for the outstanding amount with pendente lite interest. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 03 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=277011