https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276984 Workmen employed in the concerned industrial establishment are prohibited from striking while proceedings before a Tribunal are pending and for the statutory period thereafter, even if the strike concerns a different dispute. Section 23(b) was read as an absolute bar for the establishment involved, and the narrower distinction in Section 23(c) was treated as deliberate. Abatement of the industrial reference under the 1949 Ordinance did not affect criminal liability, because the material question was whether the proceedings were pending when the strike occurred. The conviction under the penal provision was therefore upheld. en-us Mon, 12 Sep 1949 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 21 Nov 2018 17:00:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276984 Workmen employed in the concerned industrial establishment are prohibited from striking while proceedings before a Tribunal are pending and for the statutory period thereafter, even if the strike concerns a different dispute. Section 23(b) was read as an absolute bar for the establishment involved, and the narrower distinction in Section 23(c) was treated as deliberate. Abatement of the industrial reference under the 1949 Ordinance did not affect criminal liability, because the material question was whether the proceedings were pending when the strike occurred. The conviction under the penal provision was therefore upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 12 Sep 1949 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276984