<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (3) TMI 53 - GAUHATI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15295</link>
    <description>The Court quashed the notices issued under sections 148 and 142 of the IT Act for the assessment year 1991-92, as the Assessing Officer lacked jurisdiction to initiate proceedings under section 147. The Court found that there was no valid reason to believe that income had escaped assessment and that the transactions in question were not genuine. Consequently, the notices were deemed invalid, and each party was directed to bear their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 15:49:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54295" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (3) TMI 53 - GAUHATI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15295</link>
      <description>The Court quashed the notices issued under sections 148 and 142 of the IT Act for the assessment year 1991-92, as the Assessing Officer lacked jurisdiction to initiate proceedings under section 147. The Court found that there was no valid reason to believe that income had escaped assessment and that the transactions in question were not genuine. Consequently, the notices were deemed invalid, and each party was directed to bear their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15295</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>