https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276978 Article 226 relief was refused where the writ sought alteration and republication of an electoral roll against only the Chairman, even though the statutory duty lay on the registering authority as a whole, creating a defect of necessary parties. The Court also declined to support an order excluding voters from the final roll because many affected persons had not received proper notice or a fair hearing. The text states that discretionary constitutional relief will not be granted to sustain an ex parte order affecting franchise rights when the proper authority is not before the Court and the procedural infirmity remains uncured. en-us Mon, 14 Dec 1953 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 21 Nov 2018 15:18:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276978 Article 226 relief was refused where the writ sought alteration and republication of an electoral roll against only the Chairman, even though the statutory duty lay on the registering authority as a whole, creating a defect of necessary parties. The Court also declined to support an order excluding voters from the final roll because many affected persons had not received proper notice or a fair hearing. The text states that discretionary constitutional relief will not be granted to sustain an ex parte order affecting franchise rights when the proper authority is not before the Court and the procedural infirmity remains uncured. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 14 Dec 1953 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276978