<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1961 (1) TMI 92 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276946</link>
    <description>A broad construction was applied to the disqualification provisions aimed at managing agents: a managing agent firm, its partners, and its power-of-attorney holder were treated as falling within the reach of an office or place of profit under the company where they exercised substantial managerial control and received remuneration-linked responsibility. The partnership form could not be used to evade the statutory purpose, and the law was read to prevent circumvention through a firm structure. On that reasoning, the managing agent arrangement attracted the disqualification under the relevant provisions, and the challenge succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2018 17:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=542843" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1961 (1) TMI 92 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276946</link>
      <description>A broad construction was applied to the disqualification provisions aimed at managing agents: a managing agent firm, its partners, and its power-of-attorney holder were treated as falling within the reach of an office or place of profit under the company where they exercised substantial managerial control and received remuneration-linked responsibility. The partnership form could not be used to evade the statutory purpose, and the law was read to prevent circumvention through a firm structure. On that reasoning, the managing agent arrangement attracted the disqualification under the relevant provisions, and the challenge succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276946</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>