<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1840 (12) TMI 1 - PRIVY COUNCIL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276936</link>
    <description>Property dedicated to a Khankah was treated as Wukf property because the grants showed a clear religious and charitable appropriation, even without technical words of dedication. The managers had no power to convert the endowment into private property or to alienate it by sale or transfer, so the impugned conveyances were ineffective against the trust. A suit brought by a duly appointed mutwaly to protect the endowment was not barred by ordinary private limitation rules. The defendant could not rely on long possession or demand repayment of the purchase money as a condition for restoration, since the possession stemmed from an unlawful alienation of dedicated property.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 1840 00:00:00 +0553</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2018 15:43:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=542831" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1840 (12) TMI 1 - PRIVY COUNCIL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276936</link>
      <description>Property dedicated to a Khankah was treated as Wukf property because the grants showed a clear religious and charitable appropriation, even without technical words of dedication. The managers had no power to convert the endowment into private property or to alienate it by sale or transfer, so the impugned conveyances were ineffective against the trust. A suit brought by a duly appointed mutwaly to protect the endowment was not barred by ordinary private limitation rules. The defendant could not rely on long possession or demand repayment of the purchase money as a condition for restoration, since the possession stemmed from an unlawful alienation of dedicated property.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 1840 00:00:00 +0553</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276936</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>