https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276923 An arbitral award made after time extensions granted by notice to parties then appearing was treated as valid where the reference only required intimation or notice, not prior consent or any stricter condition. The award nevertheless did not bind the widow of a deceased coparcener because she had a distinct co-sharer interest under Hindu law and was entitled to notice and an opportunity of hearing. Participation by her sons, later knowledge of the proceedings, or a thumb impression on the minutes book did not amount to valid representation or ratification. The majority therefore held the award could not stand, while one judge dissented on representation. en-us Fri, 06 May 1949 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 20 Nov 2018 14:41:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276923 An arbitral award made after time extensions granted by notice to parties then appearing was treated as valid where the reference only required intimation or notice, not prior consent or any stricter condition. The award nevertheless did not bind the widow of a deceased coparcener because she had a distinct co-sharer interest under Hindu law and was entitled to notice and an opportunity of hearing. Participation by her sons, later knowledge of the proceedings, or a thumb impression on the minutes book did not amount to valid representation or ratification. The majority therefore held the award could not stand, while one judge dissented on representation. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 06 May 1949 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276923