https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276921 An application to set aside an ex parte decree was treated as governed by Article 164 of the Second Schedule to the Limitation Act, 1877, because the right to apply had already accrued and become time-barred before the Limitation Act, 1908 commenced. The later Act did not revive a remedy that had already ceased to exist, and Section 6 of the General Clauses Act was stated to preserve the effect of repeal and prevent revival of a barred right. On that analysis, the application remained barred by limitation under the 1877 Act, and the 1908 Act did not reopen it. en-us Mon, 05 Feb 1912 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 20 Nov 2018 14:22:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276921 An application to set aside an ex parte decree was treated as governed by Article 164 of the Second Schedule to the Limitation Act, 1877, because the right to apply had already accrued and become time-barred before the Limitation Act, 1908 commenced. The later Act did not revive a remedy that had already ceased to exist, and Section 6 of the General Clauses Act was stated to preserve the effect of repeal and prevent revival of a barred right. On that analysis, the application remained barred by limitation under the 1877 Act, and the 1908 Act did not reopen it. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 05 Feb 1912 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276921