https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276918 A suit for restitution of conjugal rights that had already become time-barred under the Limitation Act, 1877 was not revived by the repeal of that Act and the commencement of the Limitation Act, 1908. The expired remedy remained extinguished because the repeal did not operate to restore a right or remedy no longer in force, and the saving effect of Section 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 prevented such revival. The earlier Act's own saving provision reflected the same principle. The suit therefore continued to be barred by limitation. en-us Mon, 02 Sep 1912 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 20 Nov 2018 14:18:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276918 A suit for restitution of conjugal rights that had already become time-barred under the Limitation Act, 1877 was not revived by the repeal of that Act and the commencement of the Limitation Act, 1908. The expired remedy remained extinguished because the repeal did not operate to restore a right or remedy no longer in force, and the saving effect of Section 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 prevented such revival. The earlier Act's own saving provision reflected the same principle. The suit therefore continued to be barred by limitation. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 02 Sep 1912 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276918