<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1953 (9) TMI 28 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276908</link>
    <description>Accumulated income earned outside the taxable territories was taxable on remittance only if the assessee himself actually brought it into, or received it in, the taxable territories. A direction to a debtor to pay a third party merely substituted one debtor for another and did not amount to actual receipt or constructive receipt by the assessee. The Bombay HC therefore held that the income was not taxable under the remittance provision of the Income-tax Act, 1922, and answered the reference in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 1953 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2018 12:13:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=542794" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1953 (9) TMI 28 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276908</link>
      <description>Accumulated income earned outside the taxable territories was taxable on remittance only if the assessee himself actually brought it into, or received it in, the taxable territories. A direction to a debtor to pay a third party merely substituted one debtor for another and did not amount to actual receipt or constructive receipt by the assessee. The Bombay HC therefore held that the income was not taxable under the remittance provision of the Income-tax Act, 1922, and answered the reference in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 1953 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276908</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>