<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1964 (1) TMI 63 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276902</link>
    <description>The appeals were allowed, and the suits filed by the respondents were dismissed. The Court held that the rights under the Tharao dated March 12, 1948, were not enforceable by the Municipal courts as they were not recognized by the Government. The Tharao was an executive order and not a law, and the Constitution did not protect the unrecognized rights. The letter by Mr. V. P. Menon did not constitute a waiver of the Government&#039;s right to refuse recognition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2018 11:24:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=542787" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1964 (1) TMI 63 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276902</link>
      <description>The appeals were allowed, and the suits filed by the respondents were dismissed. The Court held that the rights under the Tharao dated March 12, 1948, were not enforceable by the Municipal courts as they were not recognized by the Government. The Tharao was an executive order and not a law, and the Constitution did not protect the unrecognized rights. The letter by Mr. V. P. Menon did not constitute a waiver of the Government&#039;s right to refuse recognition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276902</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>