https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276891 A compromise decree affecting immovable property was analysed under Section 17(2)(vi) of the Registration Act, 1908, on the footing that registration is required where the decree relates to property not already the subject-matter of the suit. The first appellate court's finding that the earlier decree was not collusive was treated as a factual finding with no basis for interference. The analysis also noted uncertainty over whether the exception depends on the decree merely declaring a pre-existing right, and observed an apparent conflict between the cited decisions. The matter was therefore referred to a larger Bench for authoritative interpretation of the provision. en-us Tue, 31 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 20 Nov 2018 09:53:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276891 A compromise decree affecting immovable property was analysed under Section 17(2)(vi) of the Registration Act, 1908, on the footing that registration is required where the decree relates to property not already the subject-matter of the suit. The first appellate court's finding that the earlier decree was not collusive was treated as a factual finding with no basis for interference. The analysis also noted uncertainty over whether the exception depends on the decree merely declaring a pre-existing right, and observed an apparent conflict between the cited decisions. The matter was therefore referred to a larger Bench for authoritative interpretation of the provision. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 31 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276891