<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 953 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370610</link>
    <description>The court allowed the appeal of the revenue, ruling in favor of the revenue and against the assessee. It emphasized the importance of timely and credible retractions of statements and upheld the evidentiary value of statements recorded under Section 132(4) and Section 131 of the Income Tax Act. The deletions made by the CIT(A) and upheld by the ITAT were deemed unjustified due to the lack of supporting evidence for the retraction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2026 16:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=542762" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 953 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370610</link>
      <description>The court allowed the appeal of the revenue, ruling in favor of the revenue and against the assessee. It emphasized the importance of timely and credible retractions of statements and upheld the evidentiary value of statements recorded under Section 132(4) and Section 131 of the Income Tax Act. The deletions made by the CIT(A) and upheld by the ITAT were deemed unjustified due to the lack of supporting evidence for the retraction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370610</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>