<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 952 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370609</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, stating that no substantial question of law arises and it is merely a reappreciation of evidence. The Tribunal&#039;s reliance on its earlier judgment and the legal principles established in various precedents were deemed appropriate. The burden of proof on the assessee, especially in the case of private limited companies, was emphasized, and the Tribunal&#039;s findings were upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2018 15:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=542760" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 952 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370609</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, stating that no substantial question of law arises and it is merely a reappreciation of evidence. The Tribunal&#039;s reliance on its earlier judgment and the legal principles established in various precedents were deemed appropriate. The burden of proof on the assessee, especially in the case of private limited companies, was emphasized, and the Tribunal&#039;s findings were upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370609</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>