<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 938 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370595</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai allowed the appeal for Assessment Year 2009-10, holding that the assessee was entitled to claim deduction under Section 54F of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The ITAT considered the joint ownership of the property sold and investments in new properties, including those made by the assessee&#039;s husband. Despite transfer delays between projects, the ITAT ruled in favor of granting the deduction, directing the AO to allow the claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2018 07:48:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=542740" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 938 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370595</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai allowed the appeal for Assessment Year 2009-10, holding that the assessee was entitled to claim deduction under Section 54F of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The ITAT considered the joint ownership of the property sold and investments in new properties, including those made by the assessee&#039;s husband. Despite transfer delays between projects, the ITAT ruled in favor of granting the deduction, directing the AO to allow the claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370595</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>