<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 931 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370588</link>
    <description>Imported production measuring equipment supplied with a cutter suction dredger was treated as an inbuilt, physically integrated component of the dredging system because it was fitted in the discharge-side piping, used only for dredging operations, and not ordinarily dismantled as a separate commercial item. On that basis, the equipment was not separately classifiable under heading 90.31. The dredger was therefore regarded as a complete integrated system for customs classification and remained eligible for exemption under Notification No. 21/2002-Cus dated 01.03.2002. The separate classification demand and denial of exemption were rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 11:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=542731" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 931 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370588</link>
      <description>Imported production measuring equipment supplied with a cutter suction dredger was treated as an inbuilt, physically integrated component of the dredging system because it was fitted in the discharge-side piping, used only for dredging operations, and not ordinarily dismantled as a separate commercial item. On that basis, the equipment was not separately classifiable under heading 90.31. The dredger was therefore regarded as a complete integrated system for customs classification and remained eligible for exemption under Notification No. 21/2002-Cus dated 01.03.2002. The separate classification demand and denial of exemption were rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370588</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>