<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 930 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370587</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition seeking to quash the summoning order under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complaint filed against the company was upheld as maintainable despite the statutory notice being addressed solely to the Managing Director. The court clarified that serving notice on the Managing Director is deemed as notice to the company, meeting the statutory requirements. The irregularity in notice service did not invalidate the prosecution, and the complaint against the company was deemed valid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2018 07:47:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=542730" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 930 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370587</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition seeking to quash the summoning order under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complaint filed against the company was upheld as maintainable despite the statutory notice being addressed solely to the Managing Director. The court clarified that serving notice on the Managing Director is deemed as notice to the company, meeting the statutory requirements. The irregularity in notice service did not invalidate the prosecution, and the complaint against the company was deemed valid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370587</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>