<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 924 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370581</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, holding that the toll collection activities and related services conducted by the appellant fall under the definition of Business Auxiliary Service (BAS) and are subject to service tax. The Tribunal also upheld the applicability of the extended period of limitation for the demand of service tax, emphasizing that toll collection compensation is taxable and that road users qualify as customers under the BAS definition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2019 11:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=542722" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 924 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370581</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, holding that the toll collection activities and related services conducted by the appellant fall under the definition of Business Auxiliary Service (BAS) and are subject to service tax. The Tribunal also upheld the applicability of the extended period of limitation for the demand of service tax, emphasizing that toll collection compensation is taxable and that road users qualify as customers under the BAS definition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370581</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>