<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 921 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370578</link>
    <description>The appellant appealed against the imposition of a penalty under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 for non-payment of service tax. The penalty was initially set at 100% of the service tax amount but was reduced to 50% as the appellant had not recorded the transactions in specified records. The penalty was consequently reduced to 50% of the service tax confirmed, and the appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2018 07:46:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=542717" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 921 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370578</link>
      <description>The appellant appealed against the imposition of a penalty under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 for non-payment of service tax. The penalty was initially set at 100% of the service tax amount but was reduced to 50% as the appellant had not recorded the transactions in specified records. The penalty was consequently reduced to 50% of the service tax confirmed, and the appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370578</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>