<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 913 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370570</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the appellants, setting aside the demand for 6% of the value of electricity sold under Rule 14 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Relying on judicial precedents such as Gularia Chini Mills and Jakarya Sugars Ltd., the Tribunal held that Rule 6 did not apply to electricity generated from bagasse. The impugned orders were overturned, and the appellants were granted consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2018 07:45:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=542703" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 913 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370570</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the appellants, setting aside the demand for 6% of the value of electricity sold under Rule 14 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Relying on judicial precedents such as Gularia Chini Mills and Jakarya Sugars Ltd., the Tribunal held that Rule 6 did not apply to electricity generated from bagasse. The impugned orders were overturned, and the appellants were granted consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370570</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>