<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 912 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370569</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside duty demands and penalties imposed on manufacturers, emphasizing the lack of substantiated evidence and unreliable calculations. It highlighted the need for concrete proof in allegations of clandestine removal and remanded the case for re-adjudication based on private records, allowing cross-examination of witnesses. The Tribunal stressed the importance of independent evidence and principles of natural justice in such serious matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2018 07:45:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=542701" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 912 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370569</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside duty demands and penalties imposed on manufacturers, emphasizing the lack of substantiated evidence and unreliable calculations. It highlighted the need for concrete proof in allegations of clandestine removal and remanded the case for re-adjudication based on private records, allowing cross-examination of witnesses. The Tribunal stressed the importance of independent evidence and principles of natural justice in such serious matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370569</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>