<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (2) TMI 18 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15268</link>
    <description>SC affirmed two key tax law principles for the assessee: (1) Interest from Electricity Board deposits should not be deducted from gross total income under Section 80-I, consistent with prior precedent. (2) Expenditure of Rs. 42,512 paid to Railways for abandoned railway siding project is a deductible revenue expense for 1972-73, as liability accrued when project was abandoned, not when amount was quantified. Court ruled in favor of assessee on both issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 May 2025 13:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54268" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (2) TMI 18 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15268</link>
      <description>SC affirmed two key tax law principles for the assessee: (1) Interest from Electricity Board deposits should not be deducted from gross total income under Section 80-I, consistent with prior precedent. (2) Expenditure of Rs. 42,512 paid to Railways for abandoned railway siding project is a deductible revenue expense for 1972-73, as liability accrued when project was abandoned, not when amount was quantified. Court ruled in favor of assessee on both issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15268</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>