https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276880 A plaint cannot be rejected in part under Order VII Rule 11 CPC; it must be read as a whole, and a family settlement claim based on alleged ownership and long conduct could not be defeated at the threshold merely for want of a registered conveyance or prior adjudicated title. A possession decree also could not stand mechanically where part of the declaratory claim survived and related ownership defences remained open for trial. On limitation, a declaratory suit is barred only when the plaint itself clearly shows that the right to sue first accrued outside time; on the pleadings here, no such fatal bar was disclosed at the preliminary stage. en-us Fri, 29 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Dec 2019 18:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276880 A plaint cannot be rejected in part under Order VII Rule 11 CPC; it must be read as a whole, and a family settlement claim based on alleged ownership and long conduct could not be defeated at the threshold merely for want of a registered conveyance or prior adjudicated title. A possession decree also could not stand mechanically where part of the declaratory claim survived and related ownership defences remained open for trial. On limitation, a declaratory suit is barred only when the plaint itself clearly shows that the right to sue first accrued outside time; on the pleadings here, no such fatal bar was disclosed at the preliminary stage. Case-Laws Benami Property Fri, 29 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276880