https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276890 Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure confines a second appeal to substantial questions of law formulated by the High Court at admission, and any additional question must be framed at the hearing with recorded reasons. The Supreme Court held that the High Court acted without jurisdiction by deciding the appeal on two questions framed only in the judgment, rather than on the six questions originally admitted, because the parties were denied notice and an opportunity to address them. That procedural breach vitiated the appellate decision, so the impugned judgment was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh decision on merits in accordance with law. en-us Fri, 11 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 20 Nov 2018 07:34:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276890 Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure confines a second appeal to substantial questions of law formulated by the High Court at admission, and any additional question must be framed at the hearing with recorded reasons. The Supreme Court held that the High Court acted without jurisdiction by deciding the appeal on two questions framed only in the judgment, rather than on the six questions originally admitted, because the parties were denied notice and an opportunity to address them. That procedural breach vitiated the appellate decision, so the impugned judgment was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh decision on merits in accordance with law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 11 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276890