<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (8) TMI 22 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15264</link>
    <description>The court remanded the case to the Assessing Officer for a fresh assessment to determine if the assessee qualifies as an industrial company for tax purposes and is eligible for investment allowance based on manufacturing activities. The court emphasized the importance of assessing whether the machinery or plant claimed for the allowance is used in manufacturing articles, highlighting that a construction company can be considered an industrial undertaking to the extent of its manufacturing role. The Assessing Officer was instructed to reevaluate the matter and grant the benefit if the machinery is indeed used in manufacturing, ensuring compliance with statutory provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 13:04:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54264" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (8) TMI 22 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15264</link>
      <description>The court remanded the case to the Assessing Officer for a fresh assessment to determine if the assessee qualifies as an industrial company for tax purposes and is eligible for investment allowance based on manufacturing activities. The court emphasized the importance of assessing whether the machinery or plant claimed for the allowance is used in manufacturing articles, highlighting that a construction company can be considered an industrial undertaking to the extent of its manufacturing role. The Assessing Officer was instructed to reevaluate the matter and grant the benefit if the machinery is indeed used in manufacturing, ensuring compliance with statutory provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15264</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>