<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1961 (10) TMI 102 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276840</link>
    <description>Exemption for employee commission under the 1922 notification depended on three cumulative conditions: the payment had to be out of, or determined with reference to, business profits; it had to be disallowed in the employer&#039;s computation but included in business profits; and tax had to be assessed on the disallowed amount in the employer&#039;s hands. The third condition was admitted. On the facts, the commission was linked to sales representing trading profits, and the disallowance arose from the arrangement&#039;s tax-reduction character. The commission was therefore exempt in the assessee&#039;s hands, and the reference was answered in the affirmative.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2018 12:53:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=542624" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1961 (10) TMI 102 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276840</link>
      <description>Exemption for employee commission under the 1922 notification depended on three cumulative conditions: the payment had to be out of, or determined with reference to, business profits; it had to be disallowed in the employer&#039;s computation but included in business profits; and tax had to be assessed on the disallowed amount in the employer&#039;s hands. The third condition was admitted. On the facts, the commission was linked to sales representing trading profits, and the disallowance arose from the arrangement&#039;s tax-reduction character. The commission was therefore exempt in the assessee&#039;s hands, and the reference was answered in the affirmative.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276840</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>