<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1928 (4) TMI 3 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276837</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decree directing the defendants to execute a conveyance of the property in favor of the plaintiff. It was determined that a contract for reconveyance dating back to 1891 was valid and assignable, with the plaintiff acquiring rights as an assignee before filing the lawsuit. The Court confirmed the plaintiff&#039;s entitlement to enforce the contract, emphasizing compliance with contract conditions, leading to the dismissal of the appeal and affirming the plaintiff&#039;s right to the property conveyance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 1928 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2018 12:10:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=542614" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1928 (4) TMI 3 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276837</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decree directing the defendants to execute a conveyance of the property in favor of the plaintiff. It was determined that a contract for reconveyance dating back to 1891 was valid and assignable, with the plaintiff acquiring rights as an assignee before filing the lawsuit. The Court confirmed the plaintiff&#039;s entitlement to enforce the contract, emphasizing compliance with contract conditions, leading to the dismissal of the appeal and affirming the plaintiff&#039;s right to the property conveyance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 1928 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276837</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>